Advice from the major fuel suppliers and our own extensive laboratory testing has confirmed that compatibility and stability in VLSFO will be unpredictable. Many of the ISO 8217 compliant fuels will still cause significant issues on-board.
Over 35 ISO 8217 specification compliant fuel samples were tested, using Turbiscan, for stability and compatibility. The results show:
90% on board fuel with 10% added at port
50% on board fuel with 50% added at port
10% on board fuel with 90% added at port
There are vast differences in VLSFO on the market and the quality varies from port to port and batch to batch. Although these fuels are all classified under the same specification, they cannot be stored, handled or heated in the same way.
These images show just what can happen. This VLSFO was supplied well within ISO 8217 specification.
It was loaded into completely clean tanks and fuel system, yet failed within four hours. Total engine failure soon followed. This case is not a one-off. There have been a number of reports of fuel system failure and engine damage when using ‘on spec’ fuels.
Receive more information on our advanced fuel additives or tank cleaning range, including product datasheets, presentations or to talk to one of our Technical teams in your region, simply complete your details on the right.
By pre-treating VLSFO you can solve the problem of fuel instability and tank mix incompatibility. Octamar™ HF-10 PLUS and Octamar™ Ultra HF are the only additives that protect against both distillate sludge and asphaltene sludge.
Octamar™ HF-10 Plus keeps your engine running by stabilising fuel blends and reducing sludge formation.
Octamar™ Ultra HF provides a complete solution for VLSFO. It keeps your engine running by improving fuel blend stability and combustion while reducing soot formation.
The Turbiscan Reserve Stability test (one of the most widely used tests in marine fuel labs) predicts the likelihood and speed at which a fuel will destabilise and produce excessive sludge. A Reserve Stability Number (RSN) above 3.0 means there is a high risk of instability.
Our laboratories have tested a number of compliant fuels for stability and compatibility. The tables opposite show the results of six samples of ISO 8271 compliant fuel mixed with itself and five other samples in three different ratios, tested using Turbiscan for both stability and compatibility. The tables show all the results. All combinations of the fuel samples had a high risk of instability. When tested once treated with OctamarTM HF-10 PLUS every fuel combination tested positive with no risk of instability.
The cost of VLSFO instability is not just a full tank of fuel. Returning the vessel to port, repairing and cleaning the engine system and refuelling can run into many hundreds of thousands of dollars, before you even factor in operational losses.
Claims against fuel suppliers are rarely successful if their fuel meets specification. The oil majors have also made it clear they will not take responsibility for fuel stability after a fuel’s expiry date. This rests squarely with ship operators. So, for the operators’ peace of mind and significantly improved fuel stability, pre-treating fuel with Octamar™ HF-10 PLUS or Octamar™ Ultra HF is the only solution.
Pre-treating fuel with Octamar™ HF-10 PLUS or Octamar™ Ultra HF is highly effective at stabilising VLSFO. However, it will not reverse sludge formation. Once a fuel has chemically broken down there is no way to reverse the process.
To reduce the level of sulphur in fuel, VLSFO typically contains up to 90% distillates. This has been demonstrated through SARA analysis.
These distillates most likely come from secondary refining streams to reduce cost and they are highly unstable, more susceptible to aging and prone to rapid oxidisation, especially when mixed or heated. The result is a type of sludge formation that is very different from traditional asphaltene sludge. To stabilise it requires a different sort of chemistry.
Certain flag states have been calling for an experience building phase based around safety concerns of an unknown fuel, some are saying it is a thinly veiled attempt to delay 2020.
Guidance on ship implementation planning approved by the IMO last week will assist ship owners in preparing for the use low sulphur fuels to comply with the 2020 sulphur limit.
The 73rd session of the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee has dealt with a huge amount of work this week. Here is a brief summary of points of particular relevance to IBIA’s members.
Preparatory and transitional issues: ship implementation planning for 2020Read More
The main type of “bunker” oil for ships is heavy fuel oil, derived as a residue from crude oil distillation. Crude oil contains
sulphur which, following combustion in the engine, ends up in ship emissions.
MARPOL 2020 represents a significant change in the marine fuels landscape. Find out what BP is doing and how we are
supporting our customers in their journey to 2020 and beyond.
A number of newsletters will be produced to provide more information around how to prepare for IMO 2020 in the most cost effective method. Download the latest here, or register for free copies below.
Our focus is on supporting the fuel industry as it adapts to new opportunities and challenges. By leveraging our experience and expertise in different markets, we create the reliable, highly functional and extremely competitive packages our customers demand. Our strength is our knowledge of fuel and how to improve fuel performance for different applications.
This always keeps us one step ahead of our competitors. Our products are tried and tested in many different environments whether at sea, on the road or in the air. With a worldwide network spanning 23 countries and 2000 employees, we can deliver global solutions geared to local customer needs.
UK refineries are in good shape ahead of the looming sulfur spec change, which is set to cripple crack spreads on fuel oil and send middle distillate profits soaring.Read Now
There is much noise these days surrounding IMO2020 and its effect on the commercial shipping sector moving forward.Read Now
The captain of a cruise ship found to be burning fuel with excessive sulphur levels has been fined €100,000 (£88,500) in a Marseille court, the first such ruling in France.Read Now
Everyone has a perspective on the direction and outcome of the forthcoming IMO 2020 regulations from the refiners to the vessel operators and everyone in between within the supply chain.Read Now
Michael Banning of Innospec highlights the importance of rigorous onboard fuel storage system preperation well in advance of IMO 202, including tank cleaning and the use of additives.Read Now
Michael Banning from Innospec's Marine Fuel Specialties division charts the development of its fuel additives, and outlines the properties of its new, independently tested, heavy fuel oil treatment, Octamar Complete.Read Now
Michael Green of Intertek ShipCare and Michael Banning from Innospec review the findings of a follow-up study on the use of distillate fuel grades and lubricity issues - and also provide some insights into the uptake of recent revisions of ISO 8217.Read Now
New statistics from the French Ministry of Environment would seem to support earlier US Coast Guard findings over loss of propulsion during fuel changeovers in emission control areas. Ian Crutchley of Innospec looks at the facts and discusses the role of fuel additives in mitigating the risks.Read Now
Cold temperature behaviour in the marine distillate fuels has become a serious operational concern since the turn of 2015. Michael Banning of Innospec explores the reasons behind the issue, and reviews different techniques to assess cold flow properties.Read Now